Fixed Beam Smart Antennas

Fixed-beam smart antennas are a simple but effective method to boost the downlink capacity of UMTS FDD. In this paper we compare the two possible strategies. Using a four element uniform linear antenna array, we find the optimum sector dependent on the direction of departure (DoD) spread at the base station. For the first method we find the optimum number of beams to be four for low DoD spreads and two or three for large DoD spreads. For the second method the optimum number of beams per sector is seven for small DoD spreads and goes down to four or five beams per sector for large DoD spreads depending on base station spacing. By extensive system level simulations, we show, for 1km inter base station distance, a capacity gain of more than 160% over a conventional 3-sectored reference system by both fixed beam methods.
THE first Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS) networks are currently launched in Europe and Asia. These networks will bring high data rate services to the mobile user. As the number of subscribers increases there will be the need to extend the capacity of the initially deployed UMTS networks. Smart antennas are a possibility to increase the capacity of UMTS without the need of additional sites or additional spectrum. Smart antennas exploit the spatial domain of the mobile radio channel with the help of an antenna array and appropriate signal processing at the base station. In literature, there are several approaches for the implementation of such smart antennas. These approaches can be divided into two main strategies, the fixed beam methods and methods that apply user specific beam forming. In fixed beam methods are studied. In user specific beamforming is studied, while discuss both, fixed and user specific beamforming. In this paper we focus on fixed beam methods that lay a specific number of fixed beams over the coverage area. All mobiles in the coverage area of one beam are served by this beam. Thus in the fixed beam approach, typically more than one mobile is served by a specific beam. The beams that cover a sector can be produced either with a passive (analog) beamforming network or digitally in base band. Base band beamforming requires phase coherency all the way to the antenna elements, which is not needed if a passive network is used for beamforming For the use of fixed beams in UMTS there are two possible strategies. The first method is to use the beams to increase the sectorisation of a base station site, which is fully compliant to Release 99 and later versions of the UMTS specification and needs no cooperation by the Radio Network Controller (RNC). The disadvantage of this method is that, due to the different scrambling codes used in the different beams, which we will call logic cells, the data transmitted on the different beams is not orthogonal and the interference in regions where two beams overlap is quite high. This is avoided in the second method, which we will call switched beam method, where the beams carry only user data and a Secondary Common Pilot Channel (S-CPICH) to improve the channel estimation in the mobiles. The data channels transmitted with the different beams are typically scrambled with the same scrambling code so that their orthogonality is preserved. Therefore overlapping of neighboring beams is not as detrimental as for the first method. This method needs uplink measurements at the base station in order to determine the best beam for downlink transmission. For a fixed antenna array size at the base station, the performance of these two systems in terms of number of served users at a certain average user satisfaction depends heavily on the number of fixed beams per 120 ± sector and the allocated power for the pilot and common channels. Due to the nature of the two strategies the optimum number of beams per 120 sector will be different. We think that, for a fair comparison of the performance of the two strategies, it is essential that the two systems are compared at an operational point (number of beams per sector and pilot channel power setting) that is optimum for each method. To the knowledge of the authors there is only one paper that compares these two fixed beam methods. But this comparison is done with the assumption of six fixed beams per 120 ± sectors for both methods. These are, in fact, too many beams for the logic cell method and too few beams for the switched beam method as we will show in the following.

Free download research paper

On the Optimum Number of Beams for Fixed Beam Smart Antennas in UMTS FDD